SPS SADR/ALGERIA/MOROCCO/UN The final solution to the
conflict must conform to the international legality, notes APS
08.11.04
Algiers,
08/11/2004, (SPS) Morocco openly questions the international legality
in the very moment when the Security Council has clearly defined the
path to follow for a final solution to the conflict in Western Sahara
and called the parties to the conflict to cooperate, has commented
Sunday Algerian Press Agency, APS, in reference to the speech given by
the King of Morocco on the occasion of the anniversary of the Moroccan
military invasion of Western Sahara.
This attitude is surprising, especially that it contradicts the
attitude of the late Hassan II – God rest his soul-, whose vision and
wisdom had led to recognise the right to self-determination to the
Saharawi people during the summit of Nairobi in 1981.
This courageous position had led the two parties to the conflict –
Morocco and Polisario Front - to accept the UN's Settlement Plan (Plan
AUO/UNO 1991) and to negotiate and adopt in Houston in 1997, under the
aegis of the UN Secretary General's Personal Envoy, Mr. James Baker,
the terms and procedures of the enforcement of the referendum of the
people of Western Sahara.
The obstacles erected by Morocco during the period of the
implementation of these Accords had pushed the UN Secretary General's
Personal Envoy, Mr. James Baker, to deploy new efforts to promote an
optimum political solution within the basis of the respect of the right
to self-determination. That is why his Peace Plan for the
self-determination was unanimously adopted by the Security Council in
its resolution 1495 of July 2003, giving thus a new opportunity for a
final solution that is conform to the international legality.
After having rejected this Plan, Morocco upholds now the old thesis of
the artificial conflict and of the closed file. This thesis completely
contradicts the mandate given by the Security Council to the UN
Secretary General.
Is it necessary to recall that Western Sahara question is a
decolonisation question recognised as such by the UN since
1966?
These fundamental parameters of the international legality have again
been reaffirmed by the Security Council's resolution 1570 in October
the 28th, 2004, which is concerned with the fair and lasting settlement
of the conflict in Western Sahara.
These constant positions of the international community are an appeal
to Morocco to abide by the international legality. Algeria is convinced
that the respect of this legality would allow the peoples of the region
to start with determination the building of the common future to which
everything is leading them. (SPS)
SPS RASD/MARRUECOS/MEDIOS
Any solution other than the
referendum would be no more than "a
gesticulation and a behaviour without future", recognises Driss Basri
Paris, 08/11/2004 (SPS) The
former strong man of Morocco, the ex- minister of the Interior of
Hassan II, Driss Basri, has recognised that "any solution other than
the referendum would be no more than a gesticulation and an attitude
without exit". It is "insane and inconvenient to claim the territory
with out taking into account the population", he said, estimating that
such an attitude is egoistic and "will have no result".
The Vizier of Hassan II, out of power after the death of his master in
1999, giving his point of view in the Spanish newspaper, La RAZON, has
stressed that "the only solution is a referendum on self-determination
as proposed in the UN's Peace Plan, elaborated by Perez de
Cuéllar in 1991 and complemented by James Baker in 1997"
Here is bellow the complete translation of the interview, publicised
Sunday in La Razon, and translated by SPS to English.
" Driss Basri: “The only solution to the
conflict of the Sahara is a referendum”
París- For the first time in 30 years, the man who was the
"grand Vizier" of King Hassan II, speaks about the vision of the
Moroccan Monarch and his own on the Western Sahara conflict. In this
exclusive interview to the RAZON, Driss Basri, who was the maker of the
Moroccan "Green March" over the Spanish former colony, criticises the
policy adopted by some closest assistants of Mohamed VI, qualifying it
as "criminal and dangerous". Basri affirms that the only solution is a
referendum on self-determination, as proposed by the UN Peace Plan,
elaborated by Javier Perez de Cuéllar in 1991, and complemented
by James Baker en 1997.
- Do you bet on direct dialogue to
resolve the question of the Sahara?
- Hassan II estimated, and I will say it this way, that it is insane
and inconvenient to claim the territory with out taking into account
the population. It would be a selfish attitude that would have no
result. For this he advocated for the contact, dialogue and
negotiation. I met in many occasions with the leaders of the Polisario
Front, in Lisbon, Roma, Paris, Morocco and in the UN. Personally, and
His Majesty knew that, I was the promoter of this policy.
- Have you participate to the last
encounter that took place in Morocco?
- As well. His Majesty did say it and it is not a secret. This meeting
is the fruit of my personal efforts. They came to Rabat to meet with
the King in August 1998 (1996 – Ed), but Hassan was in convalescence.
And it was the crown prince who received them with my presence. We
negotiated and discussed for long sessions.
Distance
from the solution
- After that you accepted the
dialogue?
- Hassan II had a conception and a plan for the unity. He prepared it
before his death and I was the person in charge of implementing it. I
can not reveal more on this subject so as not to betray his memory. My
personal conviction is that we got very far from the solution. There
was a dangerous and insane deviation called "the third way". When King
Mohamed VI declared in 2001 that he had resolved the problem for good,
I publicly denounced this "third way".
- Why do you think it is dangerous?
- Because it takes us far from the Peace Plan of Perez de
Cuéllar (Settlement Plan AUO/UNO 1991- Ed), corrected and
complemented by James Baker in Houston in 1997. According to him the
only solution is the referendum on self-determination that offers to
the whole population of the Sahara, and to nobody else but them, the
possibility to decide between the integration with Morocco or
independence.
- Is there any possibility of other
solution?
- It would be no more than a gesticulation and an attitude without
exit. The Plan is clear: if with or against integration. To speak about
bastard plans, third way, is an attitude of idle intellectuals who
highly value there own sayings.
- Who will win it?
- The majority of the voters win, nothing more. And Morocco, I am
convinced, has got the means to win.
- This reminds me of what Hassan II
had said that if the majority opted for independence he would be the
first to establish diplomatic relations with the new country…
- Absolutely. Hassan II was a valiant man, and valiance implicates
clear-sightedness. He knew what he was saying.
- You cause a "scandal" lately in
Morocco for having spoken of "Western Sahara". Why this virulent
reaction which is contradictory to the political deontology?
- I am a target to an injustice, an attack which is still unveiled, one
does not expect from a kingdom such as Morocco. Each time I open the
mouth, the passions go outrageous in the adversary camp, they lose
reason and there is also a kind of hatred. It is the noise of an
orchestra of empty casseroles. Anyhow, I am a man of State. Nobody can
deprive me from this feature.
Deliberated
Intoxication
- But what is happening?
- The Aljazeera TV Channel gave me a question on the "tension" between
Algeria and Morocco. I answered that according to my information there
is no such tension, nor any preparations for war. And I added that the
Medias of the two countries are heating up the situation before the
meeting of the Security Council "that would debate over the subject of
Western Sahara". After that the drums of war reverberated.
- What does the Peace Plan says?
– It indicates that the concerned parties are Morocco and Polisario
Front and that a referendum on self-determination should be organised
in Western Sahara. This Plan is signed by our Minister for Foreign
Affairs and by the Representative of Polisario Front and it is the
subject to discussion in the 4th Committee of the Un, the Commission on
Human Rights, the General Assembly and the Security Council, four or
five times each year.
- In addition, Morocco accepts the
MINURSO? Doesn't it?
- Effectively. The Minurso is the mission of the UN for the
organisation of the referendum in Western Sahara, as its abbreviation
indicates. It was not called the MINURSAM, which means for the Moroccan
Sahara. Its boss is accredited by the king of Morocco, and the UN
Secretary General's Representative, Alvaro de Soto, was received by
Mohamed VI. I would be happy if Western Sahara is recognised as
Moroccan. But there are other ways and means to reach this. If we prove
to be selfish and narrow-minded with the international opinion, nobody
would help us recover it. Moreover, this classical geographical
terminology is known and is the most exact to name this territory, more
than calling it Moroccan Sahara.
- You ordered the intervention of the
forces of intervention against the demonstrators in El Aaiun in 1999?
- No! This demonstration in the Sahara was the subject to manipulations
from some defined persons who orbit around the power.
- And they still are there?
- They are still in the orbit. Especially Fouad Ali El Hima and some
ambitious Saharawis who wants to monopolise the management of the issue
of the Sahara. By disturbing the public order, they want to demonstrate
that the referendum was not viable and that it was necessary to go in
the third way.
- The current Minister for Interior,
Moustafa Sahel, declared that until 1999 the security services of
Morocco, you were managing, had had a weakly managed terrorism. What
would be your answer?
- Sahel has no moral, intellectual or professional authority to speak
of the security services until 1999. He is an employee who worked under
my command. Moreover, he is not the real Minister of interior. The
Minister Delegate, Fouad Ali Al Hima, is his superior. Sahel is only
the spokesperson of an unofficial organisation that coexists in
parallel to the Government.
Policy of
security
- But, what is your answer to Sahel?
- I left the Government in 1999 and the attacks of Casablanca took
place in 2003. Four years after, a sufficient time to make the
corrections, if necessary, the policy of security he did not do it.
- The leader of the Socialist Union
(USFP), Mohamed El Yazgui, was disturbed by the fact that “Le Monde”
opened its pages to you. Why?
- Because of his nonentity. Let me reveal something to you. Hassan II
knew and acknowledged that I was so closed to the USFP. The majority of
my political friends are in the socialist parties. Further, I will
reveal here the first confession on my life that I never confessed
until now. A year before he died, the King asked me in 1988 to reform
the USFP to help this party modernise itself. He wanted it to be
socio-democrat and monarchic. Its leaders, Abdarrahim Bouabid and
Abdarrahmane Youssoufi, shared this vision with the King. Mandated by
the King I helped in its reconstruction. El Yasghi destroyed it after
having assumed its leadership. I am sincerely sorrowful because it was
the party of the youth and hopes on which Hassan II relied to lead the
change-over of the political power in 1997.
Starting from the date when Mohamed VI chased him from the Government
in 1999, Driss Bassri suffers from ostracism. Some of his collaborators
were judged, accuse of corruption. After having worked for 30 years as
"the right arm" of Hassan II, he lives now in Paris without passport
and his personal wealth was confiscated in Morocco. (SPS)